TRINITI successfully represented UAB Vilniaus augma in a dispute with AB AUGA group regarding the validity of the EU trademark AUGA CO registration. The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) has ruled that AUGA CO, the AUGA group’s trademark, is confusingly similar to AUGAM, the earlier trademark of UAB Vilniaus augma, and declared the registration invalid for certain goods and services
Major Assignments - Intellectual Property & Media
We defended the creators of “Kuuuurija” regarding the so-called “cat factory” episode, as criminal proceedings were brought against the host, producer and cameraman for the offence of illegal entry. Read more
A suspicion was filed against the host of “KUUUURIJA”, Katrin Lust, regarding an unlawful search carried out in the so-called “child pornography” episode. Read more
Kaupo Kutsar is a professional farmer and politician who raised questions about whether it is correct to use the tricolour flag logo (blue-black-white) on products whose main ingredient has no ties to Estonia and whether the statements that the manager of Toiduliit made about the logo are transparent and truthful. Read more
The District Court’s judgment has not yet entered into force and the dispute may continue in the Circuit Court of Appeal.
Harju District Court delivered a judgment dismissing the claim filed by star-chiropractor Oolo against Katrin Lust.
The dispute was significant in more than one respect, as the court analysed several complex legal questions in its 42-page judgment:
- The journalistic right to use copyrighted material without the author’s consent and without paying any fees.
- The extent to which a claimant can rely on aspects derived from context, i.e. putting words in a journalist’s mouth.
- A journalist’s right to publish interviews conducted with their sources.
- A journalist’s right to use someone’s personal data if the person in question has previously published such data about themselves.
The dispute continues in Tallinn Circuit Court of Appeal.
Read more on this news story
Karmen Turk, Katri Tomson and Maarja Pild, lawyers in the TRINITI Law Firm, represented their client in the European Union’s first ICO case. In the case regarding Santiment ICO (Bloomberg in the crypto world), the parties reached a mutually acceptable compromise. In the event of a dispute, whether and how can the other party be required to transfer the crypto assets (tokens), whether a default interest can be charged for delay (if no money is involved), and what are the bailiff’s tools for enforcing a judgment rendered in a crypto asset dispute – those were some of the topics hotly debated.
TRINITI’s lawyers have also discussed the risks and disputes related to crypto assets and ICOs in the Äripäev Radio broadcast “TRINITI eetris” (TRINITI On Air).
TRINITI IP team advised and consulted a client on protection of the client’s trademark in China where the client’s trademark was illegally taken by the agent. The strategy prepared by TRINITI IP team and the steps taken should help the Client to get back the trademark from the agent.
TRINITI successfully represented an automotive industry client in the judicial proceedings concerning the unlawful use of the client’s worldwide known trademarks on cups that were sold on eBay.
TRINITI IP team provided legal advice to a dental care industry client and took legal action in order stop selling counterfeit products manufactured in China on www.amazon.com platform.